Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Pennsylvania Scrapple: The Forgotten Breakfast Meat That Refuses to Die

 

There are foods that define a region so completely that eating them feels less like a meal and more like a loyalty test. In Pennsylvania, particularly in the southeastern counties where German settlers planted their roots centuries ago, scrapple is that food. It is eaten without apology, defended with passion, and explained to outsiders with the kind of patient resignation usually reserved for discussing local weather patterns. You either grew up with it or you didn’t. And if you didn’t, you probably have questions.

Let’s answer them.

 

What Is Pennsylvania Scrapple?

Scrapple is a savory, sliceable loaf made by simmering pork scraps — the parts of the pig that don’t make it into chops, roasts, or  sausages — together with cornmeal, flour, and a careful blend of spices including sage, black pepper, thyme, and sometimes a whisper of marjoram. The mixture is  cooked until it thickens into a dense porridge, then poured into loaf pans and chilled until firm.

The resulting product is sliced into thick planks and fried in a cast iron pan until the outside develops a crackling, caramelized crust while the inside stays soft and yielding. It is served alongside eggs, tucked into sandwiches, draped with maple syrup, or eaten cold straight from the refrigerator if you are from a certain type of Pennsylvania household where waste is considered a moral failing.

 The name comes from the German word “Schmierwurst” or, more directly, from the Pennsylvania Dutch “Scrapple” — a straightforward acknowledgment of the ingredient list. You are eating the scraps. You always were. The honesty is part of the tradition.

 

The German Roots of a Pennsylvania Icon

To understand scrapple, you have to go back to the 17th and 18th centuries, when waves of German-speaking immigrants — primarily from the Rhineland-Palatinate region, from Alsace, from Switzerland — settled in the fertile farmland of southeastern Pennsylvania. These were the people who would come to be called the Pennsylvania Dutch, a corruption of “Deutsch,” meaning German.

They brought with them an agricultural philosophy built on utility. On a working farm, nothing was wasted. When a pig was slaughtered in the autumn, every part of the animal had a designated purpose. The hams were cured. The belly became bacon. The fat was rendered into lard. The intestines were cleaned and stuffed with  sausage.

 

What remained — the head meat, the organ trimmings, the odds and ends — was simmered into a rich broth. That broth was then thickened with cornmeal (a New World grain the settlers had adopted and made their own) and seasoned with the herbs and spices they knew from the European tradition. The mixture was packed into loaves, cooled, and preserved in the cold cellar or the smokehouse for the weeks ahead.

This was not a delicacy. It was a solution. A practical, intelligent, deeply resourceful answer to the problem of having more pig than plans.

What makes scrapple fascinating is how that practical solution became a cultural cornerstone. It moved from necessity to preference, from farmstead to diner counter, from something eaten because there was nothing else to something sought out with genuine enthusiasm.

 The Pennsylvania Dutch Country Heartland

The geographic center of scrapple culture is a rough triangle drawn between Lancaster, Reading, and Philadelphia, with the small cities and rural townships of Berks, Lancaster, Chester, and Delaware counties forming its beating heart.

Drive through this part of Pennsylvania on a Saturday morning and you will find scrapple on nearly every diner menu, often listed simply as “scrapple” with no further description, because none is required. Order it in an Allentown diner, a Lancaster County farmers market, or a greasy spoon in Pottstown and you will receive a slightly different version each time — a different spice blend, a different ratio of cornmeal to flour, a different thickness of slice, a slightly different shade of brown on the crust. Each cook will believe, with quiet certainty, that their version is correct.

The SPAM of the Pennsylvania Dutch, some call it, though that comparison understates both scrapple’s flavor complexity and its cultural weight. A more honest comparison might be to haggis in Scotland, or black pudding in England — a regional meat product made from secondary cuts, eaten with fierce local pride, and viewed by outsiders with a mixture of curiosity and mild alarm.

The town of Bridgeville in nearby Delaware even hosts an annual scrapple festival — Apple Scrapple, as it’s called — celebrating the crop and the  meat in equal measure. It draws tens of thousands of visitors each year, most of whom come specifically to eat large quantities of fried scrapple without social judgment.


The Anatomy of a Perfect Slice

Scrapple-making at a commercial level requires a precise balance of ingredients and technique, but the broad strokes are consistent across producers. Pork — usually a combination of head meat, heart, liver, and sometimes tongue — is simmered until tender, then removed from the broth. The meat is ground fine. The reserved broth is returned to the heat, and cornmeal and buckwheat or wheat flour are stirred in gradually to prevent lumping.

The ground pork goes back in, along with the seasoning: salt, sage, black pepper, thyme, and the proprietary spice blends that each manufacturer guards like state secrets. The mixture cooks, stirring constantly, until it pulls away from the sides of the pot. Then it’s packed into loaf pans, cooled to room temperature, and refrigerated overnight until fully set.

The result, when sliced cold, looks a bit like a pale terrine — grayish-brown, dense, faintly gelatinous at the edges. This is not scrapple’s most photogenic moment. Raw scrapple does not inspire confidence. This is something the scrapple evangelists acknowledge freely. “Trust the process,” they will tell you. “Get it in the pan.”

In the pan is where scrapple transforms. Sliced a quarter to half inch thick — thinner and it disintegrates, thicker and the interior stays cold — the slices go into a hot, lightly oiled cast iron skillet over medium to medium-high heat. They must be left alone for at least three minutes before touching them. Patience is not optional. Flip too soon and the crust won’t form. The goal is a mahogany exterior with defined edges and a soft, almost creamy interior. When it’s right, the crust crackles audibly when pressed with a fork.

This is the version that converts skeptics.


Who Makes It: The Major Producers

The commercial scrapple industry is small, regional, and fiercely competitive in the quiet way that food industries tend to be in their home territories.

Habbersett is perhaps the most widely distributed brand, founded in 1863 in the Philadelphia suburbs and now sold across the mid-Atlantic and beyond in the distinctive black packaging that generations of Pennsylvania shoppers recognize on sight. Habbersett’s scrapple is considered a benchmark — not the most adventurous version, but consistent, reliable, and possessed of a clean, sage-forward flavor that anchors the category.

 Jones Dairy Farm produces a scrapple that has expanded into national distribution, making it a common entry point for out-of-state buyers who spot it in a Whole Foods or specialty grocery. It skews slightly milder than Habbersett and has a smoother texture — a good introduction, though purists sometimes find it insufficiently assertive.

Rapa Scrapple, made in Bridgewater, Virginia (close enough to the Pennsylvania tradition that it falls within the cultural orbit), holds an almost cult following among a certain stripe of scrapple loyalist. Rapa’s flavor is more pronounced, the texture denser and more mineral in character. It is the scrapple you eat if you want to understand what the original farmhouse versions tasted like.

Godshall’s, based in Telford, Pennsylvania, is a local favorite with strong distribution across Berks and Montgomery counties. Their scrapple has a slight sweetness in the aftertaste and a notably crispy crust when fried.

Beyond these, dozens of small regional butcher shops, Amish farm stands, and farmers market vendors produce scrapple in small batches throughout Pennsylvania. These artisan versions — sometimes labeled with only a family name and a phone number — tend to be coarser in texture, more aggressively seasoned, and entirely unavailable outside a twenty-mile radius. Tracking them down is a worthwhile project.


How Pennsylvania Eats It

Ask a Pennsylvania native how they eat scrapple and you will receive, within minutes, a heated opinion about the correct condiment. This is one of the great unresolved debates of regional food culture.

The ketchup faction is large and unapologetic. The syrup faction — maple, corn, or sometimes apple butter — is equally committed, arguing that the fat and salt of scrapple requires a sweet counterpoint. There is a mustard faction, small but vocal. And there are the purists who insist that a properly fried slice of scrapple needs nothing at all.

The most common scrapple  breakfast in Pennsylvania Dutch country involves two fried eggs (over easy, traditionally), scrapple, and a side of toast or a buttered roll. Coffee is assumed. This is a meal that was designed to fuel a day of physical labor, and it performs that function without apology. It is not a light breakfast. It is not a breakfast with aspirations toward wellness. It is a breakfast that knows exactly what it is.

Scrapple also appears in sandwiches — the classic scrapple-egg-and-cheese on a kaiser roll is a staple of Philadelphia-area diners and convenience stores. It turns up on charcuterie boards at farm-to-table restaurants where it’s been reimagined with heritage breed pork and custom spice blends. It has been served on sliders at food truck festivals, incorporated into stuffing recipes at Thanksgiving, and eaten cold from the block at 11pm by people who know what they like.


The Nose-to-Tail Argument: Why Scrapple Matters Now

There is something quietly prophetic about scrapple’s ingredient list. For decades, it was treated as a mark against the food — evidence of its humble origins, proof that it was the food of people who couldn’t afford better. The “everything but the oink” framing was meant as a deterrence.

Then the food world changed. Nose-to-tail  cooking became not just acceptable but fashionable. Chefs like Fergus Henderson in London built celebrated restaurants around the principle that every part of an animal deserves skilled preparation and respectful consumption. The ethical argument — that wasting large portions of a slaughtered animal is indefensible — gained mainstream traction. Suddenly, the ingredient list that had been scrapple’s embarrassment became its credential.

Scrapple has been doing nose-to-tail cooking for three hundred years. It didn’t need a culinary movement to validate it. The Pennsylvania Dutch farmers figured out the ethical math in the 17th century and kept making the same recipe.

This reframing hasn’t dramatically changed who eats scrapple — it remains primarily a regional, working-class comfort food in its home territory — but it has opened new audiences. Food writers who might have dismissed scrapple a generation ago now approach it with the same vocabulary they’d use for offal preparations at Michelin-starred restaurants. The product hasn’t changed. The cultural context around it has.


Scrapple Tourism: Where to Eat It Right

If you are visiting Pennsylvania and want to eat scrapple the way it’s meant to be eaten, skip the hotel restaurant and head directly to one of the following:

The Shady Maple Smorgasbord in East Earl, Lancaster County, is one of the largest buffet restaurants in the United States and a temple of Pennsylvania Dutch cooking. Their scrapple is made in-house, fried to order, and served alongside a spread that will recalibrate your understanding of what a “big breakfast” means.

Reading Terminal Market in Philadelphia houses several vendors selling scrapple, including the Pennsylvania Dutch stalls that have operated there for over a century. Buying scrapple here feels like participating in an unbroken culinary tradition.

Stoltzfus Farm Restaurant near Intercourse, Pennsylvania (yes, that is the real name of the town) serves a farmhouse breakfast that includes scrapple prepared from a recipe that predates the Civil War.

Any farmers market in Lancaster, Berks, or Chester County on a Saturday morning will have at least one vendor selling homemade scrapple, often in multiple varieties — original, spicy, and sometimes a “light” version that misunderstands the assignment.


Making It at Home: The Basics

Home scrapple production has seen a modest revival among people interested in whole-animal butchery, charcuterie, and traditional preservation techniques. It is not a technically difficult project, but it requires time, a willingness to work with ingredients that require some intestinal fortitude (literally and figuratively), and a good loaf pan.

The essential components are pork stock, ground pork trim (neck  meat and shoulder work well if you’re not working with a whole head), cornmeal, a small amount of flour, salt, sage, black pepper, and thyme. The ratio that most home cooks land on after a few attempts is roughly one cup of cornmeal per quart of broth, adjusted for the texture you prefer — more cornmeal produces a firmer, crispier result, less produces something softer and more custardy.

The key variables that distinguish exceptional home scrapple from merely adequate home scrapple are the quality of the pork (pasture-raised heritage breeds produce noticeably richer flavor), the depth of the spice blend (don’t be timid with the sage), and the patience applied during frying. High heat and long contact time on each side. Don’t move it. Don’t rush it. Let the crust form.


The Cultural Weight of Scrapple

Foods that provoke strong reactions are always doing something more than providing nutrition. They are marking identity, drawing lines, preserving memory, and asserting belonging. Scrapple is all of these things.

For families with Pennsylvania Dutch roots, scrapple on the  breakfast table is a direct line to grandparents and great-grandparents and the farm kitchen culture they carried from Germany across the Atlantic. It is a flavor that encodes history in a way that no written account quite replicates. The first bite of scrapple for someone who grew up eating it does not taste like a piece of processed pork. It tastes like Saturday morning and winter light and the particular specific irreplaceable smell of a grandparent’s kitchen.

For outsiders, scrapple will never carry that freight. But it can be appreciated on its own considerable merits: as a technically interesting meat preparation, as a historically significant regional food, as a genuinely delicious breakfast when properly executed, and as evidence that American regional cuisine has depths that get overlooked when everyone is focused on barbecue and pizza.

Pennsylvania scrapple is not trying to be anything other than what it is. It is not modernizing itself for social media. It is not reinventing its packaging. It is not pivoting to address market trends. It has been the same food, more or less, for three centuries, and it will be the same food three centuries from now, eaten by people who grew up with it and will defend it without hesitation.


Why Scrapple Deserves Your Attention

The food world is currently in love with authenticity, provenance, and tradition. We spend significant energy seeking out foods that connect us to history, to place, to the labor and ingenuity of people who figured out how to feed themselves with skill and creativity. We pay premium prices for heritage products that demonstrate exactly this kind of lineage.

Pennsylvania scrapple has all of those qualities and costs about four dollars a pound.

It is a food that was invented by immigrants solving a practical problem, refined over generations into something worth eating by choice, sustained by regional loyalty through decades when the rest of the country moved on to more convenient breakfast options, and is now experiencing a quiet reassessment from a food culture that has caught up to what Pennsylvania Dutch farmers already understood.

The argument for scrapple isn’t complicated. It’s a well-seasoned, carefully made, historically grounded breakfast meat that tastes exceptional when fried correctly. It uses parts of the animal that would otherwise be discarded. It costs almost nothing. It feeds you for the entire morning.

Get it in a cast iron pan. Leave it alone. Wait for the crust. Try it with maple syrup if you want to pick a side in the great condiment debate, though honestly, a little ketchup is also correct, and the purists who say otherwise have strong opinions about everything and should be regarded with affection and mild skepticism.

Pennsylvania scrapple has survived three hundred years without your endorsement. But it would be glad to have it.



Tuesday, July 7, 2026

It may be almost impossible to make data centers pay their ‘fair share’ of electricity costs by Theodore J. Kury

 

Many major tech companies have pledged to pay their fair share of the costs associated with generating and transmitting more electricity to serve large data centers. But ratepayers across the United States are worried about the potential costs they might have to bear. That’s because it’s not immediately clear how the cost of data centers’ energy will be calculated. The effects of price increases are likely just beginning, and their full effects may not be felt for years.

For example, a recent report by the organization that monitors the PJM market, an area that encompasses all or part of 14 mid-Atlantic and Midwest states, concluded that expected power demand from data centers was a primary reason for US$23 billion in customer price increases that will last until at least the end of 2028.

I have studied the programs states have launched to address the needs of these large electricity customers. Prices are set by state utility commissions, who determine which customers’ rates will increase by how much to pay for new investments in electricity infrastructure. It’s not simple.

 

The complexity of setting prices

Setting a price for electricity is straightforward in principle but complicated in execution. Regulators identify the costs to provide service, allocate the costs to customers and design prices to recover those costs.

First, regulators identify the costs that a utility company incurs to provide service. Regulators look at the value of the assets the utility company invests in, such as power plants, transmission lines and substations, as well as its day-to-day operating expenses, such as salaries, fuel, replacement parts and electricity it purchases from other sources. Then these costs are allocated to categories of customers, such as residential, commercial and industrial.

Ideally, costs are allocated to the customers who cause them, but that can be complicated to determine. For example, imagine a data center is built in an area that lacks existing power lines and is located 50 yards from a nearby electric substation. It’s clear that the data center should pay to run a 50-yard power line from the substation to the data center.

 

But what if the power company needs to upgrade the substation to handle the increased needs of the data center? Or secure additional sources of electricity? In these cases, the investments are part of the electricity grid that everyone uses. These costs will likely be shared among all customers.

Cost analysts review each line of a utility company’s costs, often thousands of items, and determine how each cost will be allocated. Each decision incorporates one basic idea: What’s your share?

For instance, if a group of customers uses 20% of the electricity delivered by the utility, they would be allocated 20% of the costs associated with energy delivery. Other cost items may be allocated based on the number of customers or how much electricity customers use at particular points in time, but the idea is the same.

Finally, the analysts set prices that are designed to recover the costs allocated to each customer group. So, the costs that are allocated to you are directly reflected in the electricity prices that you pay.

Flexibility and a potential loophole

One common criterion for figuring out how much a customer should pay is based on what is called “coincident peak demand” – the amount a customer group uses at the moment when all customers are collectively using the largest amount of electricity. Costs associated with overall peak usage are typically split proportionally – but this opens an opportunity for data centers to exploit the system.

Data centers often are able to fine-tune their electricity consumption, using more one minute and less another, in ways that residential users can’t easily replicate. Computerized systems can automatically adjust the amount of work a data center is doing, while a homeowner would either have to race around shutting off appliances to meaningfully reduce the amount of power their home was using or invest in a device that does.

Their flexibility means data centers may be able to learn to predict when system loads will peak and consume little to no power in just the right period to avoid contributing to peak loads, as has happened with cryptocurrency-mining operations in Texas. So when regulators look at their usage to determine prices, data centers may be able to avoid paying any costs allocated through coincident peak demand, even if they use large amounts of electricity at other times.

 

Who speaks for you?

When utility regulators decide how costs should be allocated to each customer group, they solicit input from different groups. The utility company initially submits its own proposal for how it thinks costs should be allocated across its system.

Large industrial customer groups representing customers such as factories will also submit their own proposals for how to allocate costs and set rates. Retail customer groups representing large and small stores will submit theirs. And large data centers, with the resources to hire experts in cost allocation, will submit theirs as well. Some states have specific state-government agencies to do some of this work on behalf of particular commercial groups, such as Pennsylvania’s Office of Small Business Advocate.

Regulators don’t always get a good sense of residential customers’ voices, though. Every state except Georgia, Idaho and Louisiana has an office of the consumer advocate that represents customer interests in proceedings before the state utility regulator. But they are often charged with representing all customers in the state without bias, meaning they cannot advocate for outcomes that would impose costs on one group of customers in favor of another.

So while every state’s consumer advocate is concerned with keeping the utility’s costs as low as possible, they may be barred by law from adopting a position on how those costs should be allocated. This lack of representation in this aspect of rate-setting for average households may lead to situations where the data centers’ advocates argue for minimal costs to be allocated to them – but nobody advocates on behalf of residents to examine or refute that argument.

 

Citizens left holding the bag

There are other risks for residential customers, too. Utilities’ investments in electricity infrastructure last for many years. But not every proposed data center will get built, and some may use less energy than originally projected. Technology may even change, making some data centers obsolete after a year or two of operations.

If those events happen, then any costs the utility company incurred to provide enough electricity will be spread among all the other customers.

The allocation process may be even more complicated for municipal utilities regulated by city councils or independent boards, or cooperative utilities regulated by elected boards in rural communities. These groups may not have full-time staff who are utility or regulatory experts, yet they face the same decision-making challenges as trained professionals and might have to retain outside experts to aid in the process.

Consumers need to be aware of the importance of cost allocation and how it affects their electricity rates. I believe they should provide public comments to the regulators and speak during open hearings, as there may not be anyone else effectively advocating for their interests.

As climate change damages streets and highways, the road ahead may be expensive by Scott Neuman

 

A heat wave scorched much of the eastern United States over the Fourth of July weekend, bringing extreme temperatures that caused roads to buckle, snarling holiday traffic.

Nowhere was this more dramatic than on a stretch of concrete-paved Interstate 97 south of Baltimore, where one lane of traffic suddenly warped, forcing its closure. A city street in Chicago experienced a similar, though less dramatic, pavement failure, and several state departments of transportation warned motorists to watch for additional heat-related road damage.

Scientists say such heat waves are becoming more common and more intense. Climate change is driving more extreme temperatures, along with heavier rainfall. Both can contribute to pavements expanding and cracking, making roads temporarily impassable as they await expensive repairs. It raises the question: Are the nation's roads ready to meet the challenge of a warmer, wetter future?

 Civil engineers say the answers aren't entirely straightforward.

 

What is happening to the nation's roads?

Heat-related road failure occurs when moisture-weakened pavement gets hot, expands, buckles and warps — especially if the high temperatures last for several days, according to Charles Marohn, founder and president of the Minnesota-based Strong Towns, a nonprofit that advocates for more resilient and safer urban areas.

When water gets underneath a roadway, "it'll get a little bit squishy, and instead of being firm, it'll start to move a little bit," Marohn says. That weakens the pavement — and when it expands, it breaks.

"You take that prolonged period of just intense heat, a lot of traffic on top of it, and that's when you have something like this happen," Charlie Gischlar, a spokesperson for the Maryland Department of Transportation, says about the I-97 incident in Baltimore.

Amit Bhasin, a professor of civil, architectural and environmental engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, says it's typically a problem with concrete — also known as rigid — pavement. To account for expansion, steel rebar or expansion joints between concrete panels can be added, he says.

But as anyone who has driven down such highways can attest, the rhythmic clack-clack sound of expansion joints built into the pavement can be annoying for motorists.

 

"You don't want to provide too much of it because then you affect ride quality," says Bhasin, who is also the director of the university's Center for Transportation Research. But too little means "it expands more than what it's designed for, [so] it's going to buckle."

Asphalt, the sticky, black substance used to coat many roads, acts differently. "What you see is [that] … ruts form, especially in slow-moving traffic areas," he says. "It tends to be … like a liquid under a hot summer afternoon."

Marohn says asphalt is typically less durable, but easier to repair, while concrete has a longer service life before failing. But when concrete does fail, he says, "it goes really bad, really quick."

 

What can be done?

While concrete highways typically cost more to build, they tend to last longer and require less maintenance over their lifetime, Bhasin says. Asphalt roads, by contrast, are less expensive up front but generally need more frequent repairs and resurfacing.

"Any time you design an asphalt or concrete mix, you're designing for a certain range of temperatures," Marohn says. "Extreme events expose the limits of those assumptions," he says. Under normal conditions, a pavement might perform just fine, but when temperatures fall outside the expected range, problems start to appear.

For some roads, a more durable — and more expensiveblend of asphalt might be the solution, engineers say. For rigid roads, "if you're using reinforced steel, then you would want to consider different percentages of steel reinforcement," Bhasin says. "If you're applying joints, then perhaps [engineers could use] … a slightly different joint spacing ... or changing the size of the panels themselves."

The biggest problem is weather and climate data — or a lack thereof — but "if there is a trend that predicts different kinds of extreme event scenarios, then those should be incorporated into the pavement design," Bhasin says. "Engineers have figured this out, and they can design it. They just need to know what to go off of."